Biden’s last chance – Palin’s first step

Finally, the debate is over. Thankfully, neither VP candidate made a major gaffe, the sort that would be replayed ad infinitum.

Carrying forward in a time honored tradition, Senator Biden will function as Obama’s attack dog and Governor Palin will do the same for Senator McCain though in a more charming way. Both are capable politicians and will do what is expected.

There is a key difference though that became more and more obvious as the debate progressed. This is Biden’s last chance but Palin’s first step.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Advertisements

Sarah Palin, the Associated Press and Accountability

Is the Associated Press trying to manufacture a controversy? John Hinderaker (PowerLineBlog.com) has uncovered the facts but at the crux is a single issue, an omission that slants the whole story titled “Palin supports $600 million ‘other’ bridge project.”

So what did Governor Palin do wrong? AP writer (Whatever happened to reporters?) Garance Burke makes his case in the third sentence.

A $600 million bridge and highway project to link Alaska’s largest city to Palin’s town of 7,000 residents is moving full speed ahead.”

Did the “Bridge to Nowhere” die while the “Bridge to Wasilla” lives? You’d think the good Governor was doing something unethical but according to Hinderaker

the proposed bridge would supply a more direct route to Anchorage from Fairbanks and other points north.”

Wasilla stands to benefit from the bridge but only because the proposed highway would go through the town. It is not a bridge to link Anchorage to Wasilla. If anything it is a bridge that links Anchorage to Fairbanks. Nowhere in the AP article is this fine point explained.

Such contrived reporting and the ensuing manipulation of public opinion have become all too common. This isn’t about Governor Palin, Senator McCain or even the election. It’s about integrity and accountability or lack thereof on the part of the AP and its staff.

Freedom of the press is one thing. Freedom to abuse the public’s trust it quite another.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

The MSM’s Headlong Slide Into Irrelevancy

Despite the MSM-Olbermann-Matthews-lefty blogosphere hissy fit, Sarah Palin is here to stay. Of course, the longer coverage is on the is-she-ready-to-lead issue the better for Republicans from the top of the ticket to the candidates running for Congress. Any Democrat whipped into a frenzy over McCain/Palin is on board the Dem wagon already but if the media want to alienate the undecided voters, hey, go right ahead with the current game plan since it’s working so well for you.

Is anyone else finding it challenging to find coverage of the real issues? Hint to the media: Sarah Palin is not THE issue or even AN issue. Energy, jobs and the economy, terrorism, border security, pork, the list goes on, are issues. The candidates probably cover many of these subjects daily in speeches, press releases, ads, and interviews but unless one is addicted to reading dozens of websites per day, it’s frigging hard to find out what the candidates are saying though it is easy to find out what the pundits are saying/spewing/regurgitating.

To complicate matters further, readers have to overcome media bias to get to the too oft-obscured facts. Life was a whole lot easier when you could read the local newspaper or the Sunday edition of the NY Times and get a fair sense of all the news. You know, back in the day when revenues weren’t declining and “We report-You decide” was the unspoken mantra of the press rather than just a slogan for a single outlet.

Frankly, reading the candidates’ websites would be a more accurate way to learn what each believes and would do if elected. What a sorry reflection on the state of the media that is!

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

The ‘Bush Doctrine’ Poll

Charlie Gibson could have asked the question more clearly of Governor Palin but he chose to play “gotcha” over the ‘Bush Doctrine’. Did you know exactly what he was talking about or would you have needed clarification?

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Debunking Sarah Palin Rumors

It had to happen. A rumormonger left a “comment” early this morning that promoted every Sarah Palin “scandal” circulating the web. All a reader had to do was click through to his “site” via one of two links in the one sentence post. Given that, at least in part, Tiger4Truth is about finding the truth, the self-serving rumor-promoting comment has been deleted. Ah, the power of being both editor and publisher is awesome.

While sorting through the online flotsam and jetsam to see if anything could or would counter the rumors, several debunking posts turned up. The list below will get updated as additional, relevant posts come to light.

If you are looking for posts promoting the rumors, any search engine will spew them out so have at it. The online world is ready, willing and able to supply your needs.

Debunking Sarah Palin Rumors

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine